It is generally regarded as the pioneering final decision of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission. (This was before the powers of wage setting, awarding and certification of contracts were removed by the WorkChoices reform in 2006.) The list of applications includes the case number, the name of the applicant, the title of the agreement, the sector, the date of filing of the application, the approval or amendment of an agreement and the status of the application. If your application has been submitted in advance, you can check the status of your agreement by sending an email to the Commission`s contract team under firstname.lastname@example.org. The case of the three certified agreements or In Re Schefenacker, the Australian Nursing Federation and the Rural City of Murray Bridge was a case that combined appeals following decisions taken by a single commissioner on the non-certification of company agreements, given that it was assumed that the agreements contained clauses that did not relate to the relationship between the employer and the worker: for current requests, the agreement or am the following links are available. These edited documents are usually published within 3 working days of publication. The case concluded that the cases (in some forms) could be included in company agreements (and the attributions would have been followed). It was generally accepted as a great victory for the union.  The case of the three certified agreements was a decision of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, which dispelled the confusion created by Electrolux`s High Court decision against AWU. Once an application has been approved or rejected, it is no longer listed below. To find an agreement that has been approved or modified, please find an agreement. The decision was necessary to clarify the decision taken by the High Court of Australia Electrolux against AWU, which has created a lot of uncertainty about its ability to be included in corporate negotiations. Please indicate your name, matter number and the name of the agreement.
A team member should contact them within 2 business days. The status column contains information on the progress of the application as follows: the Commission`s punctuality criteria must set strict performance targets; To a certain extent, they are ambitious. We assume that there will be circumstances in which the Commission will not be able to achieve these objectives for various reasons, for example. B depending on the complexity of the request. The current repositories are as follows. The case concerned the application of a large number of union-friendly provisions such as this: if the request for an attendance hearing is made, you will find the details on the list of corresponding hearings and conferences. The decision was taken on 21 March 2005. The case has attracted a lot of attention in Australia.
This was one of the most anticipated decisions in labour relations law, with employment relations experts waiting for more than five months for electrolux to be clarified by the High Court of Australia. . . .